This content creator had no reason to believe they were cast for any roles in our project, and yet attempted to claim as such.
This is the furthest their interaction with our team has gone, and given that our project lead is generally the individual who speaks to new voice acting applicants for further demos or other information, and that this content creator apparently doesn't even know who that is, this again speaks to their complete lack of contact with our team. No further contact was made with this content creator, they were never cast in any roles, and there was never any discussion of them having a role. Such applications are made utilizing a submission form that provides no direct contact with our team, and this individual's dialogue with us begins and ends with the sending of their submission. We do have an audition on file that had been submitted by this content creator, however we chose to pass as we felt their work was not what we were looking for at the time. This content creator has never had any involvement with our team, has never had internal contact with our team, and has never produced any voice acting for our team. This information has been provided not to attack this content creator's work output, but to provide context for what will follow in this posting.įirst, we should address some misinformation that this content creator has been spreading. It is not an exaggeration to state that this content creator often relies on shock and outrage to make money, and thus is best served by seeking out or involving themselves in situations where these things are present or able to be stoked. Indeed, a quick examination shows that their entire channel is effectively fueled by this kind of content, with the vast majority of their videos receiving 3-30x fewer views than their other videos focused on the aforementioned controversy or outrage.
This youtuber in question has a long-standing history of driving traffic to their channel via the use of controversy and outrage, often fabricated.
Unfortunately, as is the norm for this content creator in situations such as this, this is almost entirely a fabrication.
Following their posting of fabricated information of dubious origin, alleging that this information was from the moderator in question, the content creator also then indicated that they were going to 'put our project on blast' and alluded to the fact that the reason for their removal from our community was due to their refusal to be 'complacent with borderline illegal content' in another mod project. Now, with all of that out of the way, let's get into this information proper.Īs many of you are no doubt aware, a minor content creator announced today that we had elected to remove them from our community some months ago, having learned of this after a member of our moderation staff stepped in and questioned their claims of being a voice actor on our project. We apologize if this leaves some questions unanswered, but we've attempted to be as comprehensive as possible. We should also note that this is the only post we will be making about this situation, as we have no desire to provide this content creator with further fodder for clickbait. Please accept our sincerest apologies if this language seems a bit strange to you as a result. With that being the case, our team will not be naming this individual - given that they actively profit from the outrage they have stirred up, we have no interest in allowing them to quite literally make money off of the harassment of our team members and attacks on our community. We should not mince words - we have zero interest in giving the subject of this post any further attention, but at the same time find ourselves forced to respond to their allegations.